Food with intention- shared in context

The Dream Was Always the Table

When my husband John and I first started talking seriously about a culinary business, we watched the Netflix series Chef’s Table. I loved seeing how many different forms a restaurant could take, and how each chef seemed to offer not just food, but a world of their own.

In Season 2, Dominique Crenn said something that stayed with me. She described her restaurant not just as a restaurant, but as her house — a place where, if you came in, you were allowing her to speak to you.

That was the part I wanted to create for others with my culinary skills. Not the scale. Not the prestige. Not even the idea of owning a restaurant itself. I wanted to build a place that felt like being welcomed in.

I knew I wanted the space I created to have the feeling of home, but with more wonder woven through it. I wanted people to feel cared for, curious, and excited. I wanted the food, the atmosphere, and the conversations around the table to braid together. I wanted to cook for people in a way that felt intimate, thoughtful, and dynamic.

For a long time, I struggled to understand what shape that should take.

At first, the answer seemed to be a restaurant. We planned one carefully: farm-to-table, located in a greenhouse, with limited seating and an environment designed to feel more sensory-sensitive and calm. Hindsight makes it clear that even then, the part I cared about most was not simply running a restaurant. My focus was on relationship-building, curiosity, care, and creating an environment where both guests and staff could feel safe enough to grow.

The clearest version of the vision was always this:

People first. Then experience. Then food.

I wanted every guest to feel a kind of unreasonable hospitality when they entered the space. I wanted them to feel like they had stepped into something thoughtful and generous, but not stiff or performative. I wanted beauty without pretense. I wanted care without pressure. I wanted the table to feel like an invitation to show up as you are.

But a restaurant requires a certain amount of size and scale to be viable. Over time, I began to realize that the structure of a traditional restaurant might actually pull me away from the intimacy I was trying to create.

Around that time, John had read Finding Freedom by Erin French and suggested that I start with supper clubs as a way to build interest and let people experience my food. I thought this was a good stepping stone on the path to something more.

In designing a supper club, I found the shape I had been trying to name all along. It gave me a way to set a table with intention, cook food I was proud of, and build a room where people could connect with the meal, with the atmosphere, and with each other.

A supper club lets the experience stay small but meaningful. It lets me notice the details. It lets the menu tell a story. It lets the evening unfold around one shared table instead of disappearing into the pace and anonymity of larger service.

This is where I know the magic can happen.

The structure of these gatherings may change with time. The locations may shift. The menus will change with the seasons. But the size and shape of the supper club feels right for the kind of intimacy I want to create and be part of.

I want each experience to delight the senses and leave you wanting to come back. I want you to feel excited to come to the table, to explore with me, and to share in something that feels thoughtful, personal, and without pretense.

Because the dream was never just the restaurant.

Discover more from In/Context

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading